Thursday 17 May 2012
Log in
The Journal on Facebook RSS Feed

Agenda set for EUSA AGM

Alcohol and medical patenting policies up for debate, but technicality halts vote on liberation officers
EUSA General Meeting 2008
EUSA General Meeting 2008

Article tools

Edinburgh University Students Association (EUSA) is holding its Annual General Meeting (AGM) Wednesday. It comes following recent Student Representative Committee debates in regards to potential constitutional amendments, and will confront various issues raised by current university students.

More motions have been proposed this year than at any previous AGM. These include issues related to identity cards and alcohol consumption, and the university’s medicine patenting policies.

Students want to ensure that medicines and health-related innovations developed at Edinburgh University are available at low cost to all low and middle income countries. Currently patents are often sold to the highest single bidder who then has a monopoly on the market because of the lack of a competitive market.

EUSA President Adam Ramsay commented: “The motion about access to essential medicines may or may not be controversial. Edinburgh does serious medical research, and the motion, proposed by medics, looks at ways the drugs resulting from this can be accessible to everyone who needs them. If the proposers of the motion are right—and that is what the debate will be about—this could save huge numbers of lives around the world.”

The Vice President of Academic Affairs, Guy Bromley, is bringing a motion to the AGM that EUSA needs to change its stance on the legal drinking age to one which would permit 16-year-olds to consume low alcohol drinks in bars and pubs.

Mr Bromley told The Journal: “Our motion will bring young people into an environment where their drinking is supervised and safer. There is currently no distinction in the law made between a 70 per cent bottle of absinthe and a four per cent beer. This must surely be wrong, and contribute to the difficulties associated with alcohol and young people."

He said that many other Northern European countires take this line, for example in Denmark the drinking age is 15 and in Germany and Belgium 16. He said: “I'm not suggesting that we'll ever develop such attitudes to alcohol whereby we can follow Cyprus's example of allowing 12 year olds to legally purchase, but I think that making this AGM policy would arm EUSA with the tools needed to fight for more responsible alcohol policy in the future.”

The government’s contentious National Identity Card scheme, which is due to come into action from 25 November, has provoked a response from two separate groups of Edinburgh students. However, both have proposed different ways of reacting to the development of the information database; while student Oliver Munder is asking for EUSA to campaign legislatively against the ID cards, his colleague Stephanie Irene Spoto calls for a voluntary international student boycott of them altogether. Mr Ramsay believes this is “on the one hand, supporting people in breaking the law, yet, on the other, arguably the only actual way to stop the ID card proposals.”

Other motions proposed this year include giving student societies the right to bring their own food and non alcoholic drinks into the union buildings and promoting a EUSA supported campaign for free education.

The vice-principals will also be attending the meeting to answer questions about feedback issues.

The AGM is behind all major decisions taken by EUSA, and in the past motions have been carried through to make Edinburgh University the first Fair Trade university in Scotland, and to organise a full-scale boycott of all Nestlé products in EUSA outlets.

For any motion to pass at the AGM, it needs 300 votes in its favour, and all voters must bear a valid matriculation card.

 

Some of the people reading this article may have heard of African sleeping sickness, dengue fever, leishmaniasis and lymphatic filariasis. If you haven't though you're not alone, these are just some for the 14 diseases listed by the WHO as "neglected diseases." They are called so because they exist predominantly in the poorest and most marginalized communities in the world, and are all but elminated and forgotten  in the western world. The diseases thrive in places with unsafe water, poor sanitation, and limited access to basic health care. Even though these diseases' leave a trail of disability and life long pain, they are often ignored and given a low priority alongside high mortality diseases.

Neglected diseases affect over one billion people worldwide and nearly every one has the potential to be treated or even eradicated completely. However, because those affected have neither the money nor the political voice to demand treatment they are largely overlooked by pharmaceutical companies who measure their success by potential profit and not by physical benefit.

Currently  some treatments exist but many are now ineffective because the diseases have developed resistance, and many of the other available treatments are simply not functional because they are old, toxic and expensive. In addition many require expert medical knowledge, which is often unavailable, to administer them correctly. 

Edinburgh University is already taking steps to fill this void and re-write the imbalance in global health. There is ongoing research into African sleeping sickness led by Professor Sue Welburn and I hope that it can use this as a spring board towards further developments leading to increased research into neglected diseases.  This is because as a university, which receives less than five per cent of its research funding from pharmaceutical companies and given its claim that it exists to help promote "health and economic and cultural wellbeing," it is in a unique position to stand forward in the battle against neglected diseases.

We, as students, can mandate the university to make such an effort by attending the EUSA annual general meeting and voting to support the motion put forward by UAEM (universities allied for essential medicines) to create a policy whereby the university chooses its research not by potential profit but by physical benefit.

Chris Lawrence

 

blog comments powered by Disqus