Saturday 11 February 2012
Log in
The Journal on Facebook RSS Feed

EUSA AGM not quorate again

Not enough students in attendance for any motions to be passed
EUSA AGM
EUSA AGM
Image: Silvia Foteva

Article tools

After failing to encourage more than 300 Edinburgh students to attend the General Meeting last Wednesday evening, EUSA’s four sabbatical officers faced the embarrassment of yet another meeting which has ended with nothing being achieved.

Eight out of ten motions brought forward were nonetheless debated and voted upon. EUSA president Adam Ramsay held a vote as to whether the two constitutional amendments of changing the licensing laws at the Kings Building Bar and enabling the SRC to mandate voting decisions on behalf of the elected NUS delegates should be debated.

Ramsay deemed them to be "boring" constitutional measures, and said there was no point in debating them if nothing concrete was to be achieved and the vote decided to veto these amendments.

A small number of students took offence at this and duly left the lecture theatre.

All other motions received an indicative vote in favour, including, ironically, the a constitutional amendment which calls for a drastic change to the current GM voting system. Adam Ramsay introduced a referendum motion proposing that students be allowed to vote online instead of having to physically turn up to the meeting.

Due to the inquorate status of the AGM, however, none of the motions voted on can be formally ratified.

The initial blame for this reoccurring shortfall fell as usual on the four Sabbatical officers, although it was pointed out that there was an intensive publicity campaign for the meeting around both campuses to which the student body remained fairly unresponsive.

Speaking to The Journal Mr Ramsay said: "It’s a shame we didn’t have enough people to pass the constitutional amendments, but the General Meeting brought forward loads of great ideas, and we’ll be taking those forwards, so I’m really glad people got involved and brought motions."

Three out of the four candidates for EUSA president spoke during the debates, including Oliver Mundell, who supported the motion for reducing the student medics' fees claiming he "had found out just how helpful doctors are recently." Mr Mundell is currently campaigning in a mobility scooter, after piercing his foot on a spike while climbing into George Square gardens.

Motions for reducing the VAT charged in academic buildings, and increasing the quality of feedback on academic work—a motion brought to the GM by presidential hopeful Liz Rawlings—went unquestioned and passed with a unanimous vote.

The remaining motions also passed including the introduction of birthdates onto all new matriculation cards, a campaign for the library to be open 24 hours and a minibus for societies brought forward by EUSA presidential candidate Thomas Graham.
The motion for lowering CSE booking prices was closely contested, as was the medic fees proposal, but both were passed with small margins.

However, when the floor was opened for private member’s questions one theme recurred throughout: how can we get out of this rut? The sabbaticals took some of the responsibility with Guy Bromly simply stating: "We tried our best but I’m sorry we obviously haven’t done enough."

One the other hand, George Thomas was convinced that "every problem can be solved with a Facebook application," whilst Naomi Hunter was convinced it was a matter of finding new ways to "engage" more students into student politics.

The four sabbaticals encourage anyone with a good idea to translate it into a "Big Idea" by writing it down on a post-it note and sticking it on the brick walls that are situated around campus for the duration of this week.

blog comments powered by Disqus